Foggy Future
Sep. 5th, 2008 11:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been silent on LJ over the past few months, somewhat intentionally as I do some personal regrouping. But some subjects call for commentary regardless...
As some know, I served as President of FCD for several years. It was a growth experience as they say. But we (and it was a "we" effort not a "me" story) kept the club going despite some significant challenges. We had fun. FCD was financially solid at the time with class sizes highly variable but sufficient. It was evident that the square dance 'baby boom' of the 1990's, was in transition. We now had to work to find new class members rather than having them flock to our doors (most often by referral from the then current FCD faithful). Volunteerism is a fickle beast but we got it all done somehow. Our teaching callers were, I thought, among the best. FCD class graduates were strong in the basics and fared well at conventions. We had well attended dances with some great callers.
It was with a sinking feeling that I read an Email a few minutes ago from Richard, the current FCD President, announcing that Mainstream classes were being canceled for the second consecutive time. I find myself fearing that unless some miracle should drop from the skies, this is the beginning of the end for Foggy City. The club seems on life support. A quick yank of the cord and it will be over for one of the first gay square dance clubs in the US.
I am in no way pointing a finger at the current FCD Board or membership. The club has some wonderful caring folk who donate their energies and time without any hope of direct thanks. To them I say "THANK YOU!". Although I am taking a break from dancing (after 10 years it was overdue) and am no longer a San Francisco resident, my square dance roots will always be with Foggy City.
So what's wrong if it's not the Board or the club membership? Time and again at conventions I'd hear about the closure of one IAGSDC club or another. I'd hear that club memberships in general were shrinking. Hands were wrung. "This isn't good" was mumbled by those who had the long view. Yet we all danced on, convinced that it would never end. In the Bay Area, clubs would rarely network together perhaps because of ego, perhaps merely that such ideas were not ranked highly enough despite the fact that we were less than 50 miles apart. And yet we danced on. In San Francisco itself, many folks (and I was hardly the first) lamented that three square dance clubs in one city was at least one too many. Efforts to consolidate were rejected, sometimes bluntly. Short sighted? Yes, in my view, very much so. And yet we danced on.
Cannibalism, square dance style? Yes, I fear so. And yet we continue to dance on.
Sad
As some know, I served as President of FCD for several years. It was a growth experience as they say. But we (and it was a "we" effort not a "me" story) kept the club going despite some significant challenges. We had fun. FCD was financially solid at the time with class sizes highly variable but sufficient. It was evident that the square dance 'baby boom' of the 1990's, was in transition. We now had to work to find new class members rather than having them flock to our doors (most often by referral from the then current FCD faithful). Volunteerism is a fickle beast but we got it all done somehow. Our teaching callers were, I thought, among the best. FCD class graduates were strong in the basics and fared well at conventions. We had well attended dances with some great callers.
It was with a sinking feeling that I read an Email a few minutes ago from Richard, the current FCD President, announcing that Mainstream classes were being canceled for the second consecutive time. I find myself fearing that unless some miracle should drop from the skies, this is the beginning of the end for Foggy City. The club seems on life support. A quick yank of the cord and it will be over for one of the first gay square dance clubs in the US.
I am in no way pointing a finger at the current FCD Board or membership. The club has some wonderful caring folk who donate their energies and time without any hope of direct thanks. To them I say "THANK YOU!". Although I am taking a break from dancing (after 10 years it was overdue) and am no longer a San Francisco resident, my square dance roots will always be with Foggy City.
So what's wrong if it's not the Board or the club membership? Time and again at conventions I'd hear about the closure of one IAGSDC club or another. I'd hear that club memberships in general were shrinking. Hands were wrung. "This isn't good" was mumbled by those who had the long view. Yet we all danced on, convinced that it would never end. In the Bay Area, clubs would rarely network together perhaps because of ego, perhaps merely that such ideas were not ranked highly enough despite the fact that we were less than 50 miles apart. And yet we danced on. In San Francisco itself, many folks (and I was hardly the first) lamented that three square dance clubs in one city was at least one too many. Efforts to consolidate were rejected, sometimes bluntly. Short sighted? Yes, in my view, very much so. And yet we danced on.
Cannibalism, square dance style? Yes, I fear so. And yet we continue to dance on.
Sad